 | |  |  | 

One of the looming challenges educators face today is understanding how student diversity and uniqueness impacts the complex process of learning.
Affective and conative factors are increasingly
examined as we seek to understand how to teach
and support the whole learner. The goal is to build
theory that informs practice so that we may, as
Martinez argues, move beyond “fuzzy, one-size-fi tsall
[instructional] solutions” to instruction that is
designed to match individual learning needs.
Factors such as motivation, self-effi cacy,
learning styles, and emotional intelligence have
become increasingly common terms in educational
research as we seek to defi ne affective and conative
variables that impact the learning process as well
as design of instruction. However, as with much
of educational research, there are a vast number
of complex, interrelated variables to consider and
no one easy solution. View all 51 works published by Journal of Computer Documentation |
 Expanding Beyond a Cognitivist Framework: A Commentary on Martinez’s “Intentional Learning in an Intentional World” http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/330409.330412
access restricted (by the publisher) to members/subscribers/customers only
peer-reviewed
Kirkley, Jamie and Thomas Duffy Journal of Computer Documentation 2000
Abstract: One of the looming challenges educators face today is understanding how student diversity and uniqueness impacts the complex process of learning.
Affective and conative factors are increasingly
examined as we seek to understand how to teach
and support the whole learner. The goal is to build
theory that informs practice so that we may, as
Martinez argues, move beyond “fuzzy, one-size-fi tsall
[instructional] solutions” to instruction that is
designed to match individual learning needs.
Factors such as motivation, self-effi cacy,
learning styles, and emotional intelligence have
become increasingly common terms in educational
research as we seek to defi ne affective and conative
variables that impact the learning process as well
as design of instruction. However, as with much
of educational research, there are a vast number
of complex, interrelated variables to consider and
no one easy solution.
|
 |
 |  |