Added by Geoff Sauer on Oct 17, 2002.
Average rating: 3.00/5.00 (n=2, std dev: 1.41)
 


In this article we explore how some contemporary language usage presents challenges for technical editing. Drawing on scholarship in the rhetoric of science and in critical linguistics, we argue that language does affect our perception of reality. Consequently, the language used in some technical documents needs to be reconsidered or even challenged by technical editors. Present textbooks on technical editing do not directly confront this issue, though some scholars have begun to challenge the use of terms such as 'studgun.' We conclude by demonstrating how a critical analysis of metaphors in everyday technical documents would help students question these language choices and draw attention to the consequences of using them.
 
  View all 102 works published by Technical Communication Quarterly  

Please share your rating/opinion of "Masters, Slaves, and Infant Mortality: Language Challenges for Technical Editing".
 PoorExcellent 
The link to this work seems to be broken.

Copyright © 2001-09 by the EServer. All rights reserved.Add a Work | Update this Work | Discussion Forum | Habitués